Rewrite lab with BoW
This commit is contained in:
46
classifiers/bag_of_words.py
Normal file
46
classifiers/bag_of_words.py
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
from collections import Counter
|
||||
|
||||
import numpy as np
|
||||
from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin
|
||||
from sklearn.feature_extraction import DictVectorizer
|
||||
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
|
||||
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
from classifiers.feature_classifier import FeatureExtractor
|
||||
from cleaning.transformers import LowercaseTransformer, PunctuationRemover
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class BagOfWordsClassifier(BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin):
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.cleaning = Pipeline([
|
||||
("lowercase", LowercaseTransformer()),
|
||||
("punctuation", PunctuationRemover()),
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
def fit(self, X, y):
|
||||
X_clean = self.cleaning.fit_transform(X)
|
||||
self._pipeline = Pipeline([
|
||||
("features", FeatureExtractor(self.extract_features)),
|
||||
("vectorizer", DictVectorizer()),
|
||||
("classifier", LogisticRegression(max_iter=1000)),
|
||||
])
|
||||
y_binary = (np.array(y) == "spam").astype(int)
|
||||
self._pipeline.fit(X_clean, y_binary)
|
||||
return self
|
||||
|
||||
def predict(self, X):
|
||||
X_clean = self.cleaning.transform(X)
|
||||
y_binary = self._pipeline.predict(X_clean)
|
||||
return np.where(y_binary == 1, "spam", "ham")
|
||||
|
||||
def extract_features(self, message):
|
||||
return dict(Counter(message.split()))
|
||||
|
||||
def feature_weights(self, top_n=10):
|
||||
vectorizer = self._pipeline.named_steps["vectorizer"]
|
||||
classifier = self._pipeline.named_steps["classifier"]
|
||||
names = vectorizer.get_feature_names_out()
|
||||
weights = classifier.coef_[0]
|
||||
pairs = sorted(zip(names, weights), key=lambda x: x[1])
|
||||
half = top_n // 2
|
||||
return pairs[-half:][::-1] + pairs[:half]
|
||||
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ from sklearn.feature_extraction import DictVectorizer
|
||||
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
|
||||
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
from cleaning.transformers import LowercaseTransformer
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class FeatureExtractor(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):
|
||||
def __init__(self, extract_fn):
|
||||
@@ -24,10 +22,9 @@ class FeatureClassifier(BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin):
|
||||
|
||||
def fit(self, X, y):
|
||||
self._pipeline = Pipeline([
|
||||
("lowercase", LowercaseTransformer()),
|
||||
("features", FeatureExtractor(self.extract_features)),
|
||||
("vec", DictVectorizer()),
|
||||
("clf", LogisticRegression(C=self.C, max_iter=1000)),
|
||||
("vectorizer", DictVectorizer()),
|
||||
("classifier", LogisticRegression(C=self.C, max_iter=1000)),
|
||||
])
|
||||
y_binary = (np.array(y) == "spam").astype(int)
|
||||
self._pipeline.fit(X, y_binary)
|
||||
@@ -39,15 +36,15 @@ class FeatureClassifier(BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin):
|
||||
|
||||
def extract_features(self, message):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"contains_free": int("free" in message),
|
||||
"contains_free": int("free" in message.lower()),
|
||||
"num_exclamations": message.count("!"),
|
||||
"length": len(message),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def feature_weights(self, top_n=10):
|
||||
vec = self._pipeline.named_steps["vec"]
|
||||
clf = self._pipeline.named_steps["clf"]
|
||||
names = vec.get_feature_names_out()
|
||||
weights = clf.coef_[0]
|
||||
vectorizer = self._pipeline.named_steps["vectorizer"]
|
||||
classifier = self._pipeline.named_steps["classifier"]
|
||||
names = vectorizer.get_feature_names_out()
|
||||
weights = classifier.coef_[0]
|
||||
pairs = sorted(zip(names, weights), key=lambda x: abs(x[1]), reverse=True)
|
||||
return pairs[:top_n]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
|
||||
import numpy as np
|
||||
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
from classifiers.manual import ManualClassifier
|
||||
from cleaning.transformers import LowercaseTransformer
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ManualCleaningClassifier(ManualClassifier):
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.cleaning = Pipeline([
|
||||
("lowercase", LowercaseTransformer()),
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
def fit(self, X, y):
|
||||
self.cleaning.fit(X)
|
||||
return self
|
||||
|
||||
def predict(self, X):
|
||||
X_clean = self.cleaning.transform(X)
|
||||
return np.array([self.predict_one(msg) for msg in X_clean])
|
||||
60
questions.md
60
questions.md
@@ -44,25 +44,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Checkpoint 3: Data Cleaning
|
||||
## Checkpoint 3: Designing Features by Hand
|
||||
|
||||
**8. Which transformers did you add to the pipeline, and in what order?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
**9. Did any transformer hurt performance? Why might cleaning sometimes make things worse?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
**10. If you removed the lowercasing from your `predict_one` method now that the pipeline handles it, would your results change?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Checkpoint 4: Feature Engineering
|
||||
|
||||
**11. List all the features you implemented and the reasoning behind each:**
|
||||
**8. List all the features you implemented and the reasoning behind each:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature name | What it measures | Reasoning |
|
||||
|-------------|-----------------|-----------|
|
||||
@@ -70,7 +54,7 @@
|
||||
| | | |
|
||||
| | | |
|
||||
|
||||
**12. Record your best results:**
|
||||
**9. Record your best results:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Value |
|
||||
|--------|-------|
|
||||
@@ -78,11 +62,35 @@
|
||||
| Spam recall | |
|
||||
| Spam F1 | |
|
||||
|
||||
**13. Which features received the largest positive weights (most predictive of spam)?**
|
||||
**10. Which features received the largest positive weights (most predictive of spam)? The largest negative weights (predictive of ham)? Does this match your expectations?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
**14. Which features received near-zero weights? Why might the model have ignored them?**
|
||||
**11. Did any feature you thought would help receive a near-zero weight? Why might the model have decided it was unimportant?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Checkpoint 4: Bag of Words
|
||||
|
||||
**12. Which transformers did you include in your cleaning pipeline, and in what order? Explain how each one changes the vocabulary.**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
**13. Record your best results:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Value |
|
||||
|--------|-------|
|
||||
| Spam precision | |
|
||||
| Spam recall | |
|
||||
| Spam F1 | |
|
||||
|
||||
**14. How did the bag-of-words classifier's performance compare to your best hand-designed-features classifier? What do you think accounts for the difference?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
**15. Look at the words with the strongest weights (in either direction). Do any surprise you? What do they suggest about how the model is making its decisions?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +98,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Questions
|
||||
|
||||
**15. Pick a different classification problem (for example: positive vs. negative movie reviews,
|
||||
**16. Pick a different classification problem (for example: positive vs. negative movie reviews,
|
||||
news articles vs. opinion pieces, or medical vs. general-audience text).
|
||||
Propose five features you would extract to classify it, and explain your reasoning.**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -104,17 +112,11 @@ Problem I chose:
|
||||
| | | |
|
||||
| | | |
|
||||
|
||||
**16. Could adding more features ever *hurt* the performance of a classifier? Explain
|
||||
**17. Could adding more features ever *hurt* the performance of a classifier? Explain
|
||||
when and why this might happen.**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
**17. It would be possible to make every word in the vocabulary a feature, where each
|
||||
feature indicates whether that word appears in the message. Explain how this could
|
||||
be implemented. Do you think it would work well? What are the trade-offs?**
|
||||
|
||||
*Your answer:*
|
||||
|
||||
**18. In this lab you split the data into 70% training and 30% testing. What would happen
|
||||
if you used 99% for training and 1% for testing? What about 1% for training and 99%
|
||||
for testing?**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user