generated from mwc/lab_pipes
	This lab was very different from Unit 1. This lab required more critcal thinking skills rather than exploration I felt. I struggled with this one the most out of all the other labs we have had to complete as I had to think deeper with the specific commands. This thinking came from other computer science course I have taken along with mathematics courses. I honestly felt that working with a smaller group of words might have been easier to I could really understand what the commands mean. With such a large pool of words it was hard to really understand if I was using the commands correcting but once I got the hang of it I understood it. Yes, I did get stuck with the last four questions. I had to really go back to the notes to understand the commands but like I said above once I got the hang of it. It became easy. The type of stuck was different from Unit 1 as Unit 1 felt more outlined for me and more direct where this lab was not as direct. Yes, I have gotten help from peers as when I struggle I ask what they have done to get the correct answer. I have also asked you for help when I come across a problem.
		
			
				
	
	
		
			23 lines
		
	
	
		
			442 B
		
	
	
	
		
			TOML
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			23 lines
		
	
	
		
			442 B
		
	
	
	
		
			TOML
		
	
	
	
	
	
[project]
 | 
						|
name = "lab-pipes"
 | 
						|
version = "0.1.0"
 | 
						|
description = ""
 | 
						|
authors = [
 | 
						|
    {name = "Chris Proctor",email = "chris@chrisproctor.net"}
 | 
						|
]
 | 
						|
license = {text = "MIT"}
 | 
						|
readme = "README.md"
 | 
						|
requires-python = ">=3.10,<4.0"
 | 
						|
dependencies = [
 | 
						|
    "wordflow (>=0.2.4,<0.3.0)",
 | 
						|
    "setuptools (>=80.9.0,<81.0.0)"
 | 
						|
]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
[build-system]
 | 
						|
requires = ["poetry-core>=2.0.0,<3.0.0"]
 | 
						|
build-backend = "poetry.core.masonry.api"
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
[tool.poetry]
 | 
						|
package-mode = false
 |