generated from mwc/lab_pipes
This lab was very different from Unit 1. This lab required more critcal thinking skills rather than exploration I felt. I struggled with this one the most out of all the other labs we have had to complete as I had to think deeper with the specific commands. This thinking came from other computer science course I have taken along with mathematics courses. I honestly felt that working with a smaller group of words might have been easier to I could really understand what the commands mean. With such a large pool of words it was hard to really understand if I was using the commands correcting but once I got the hang of it I understood it. Yes, I did get stuck with the last four questions. I had to really go back to the notes to understand the commands but like I said above once I got the hang of it. It became easy. The type of stuck was different from Unit 1 as Unit 1 felt more outlined for me and more direct where this lab was not as direct. Yes, I have gotten help from peers as when I struggle I ask what they have done to get the correct answer. I have also asked you for help when I come across a problem.
23 lines
442 B
TOML
23 lines
442 B
TOML
[project]
|
|
name = "lab-pipes"
|
|
version = "0.1.0"
|
|
description = ""
|
|
authors = [
|
|
{name = "Chris Proctor",email = "chris@chrisproctor.net"}
|
|
]
|
|
license = {text = "MIT"}
|
|
readme = "README.md"
|
|
requires-python = ">=3.10,<4.0"
|
|
dependencies = [
|
|
"wordflow (>=0.2.4,<0.3.0)",
|
|
"setuptools (>=80.9.0,<81.0.0)"
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[build-system]
|
|
requires = ["poetry-core>=2.0.0,<3.0.0"]
|
|
build-backend = "poetry.core.masonry.api"
|
|
|
|
[tool.poetry]
|
|
package-mode = false
|